Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

[OM] Re: OT: F31fd Replacement

Subject: [OM] Re: OT: F31fd Replacement
From: "Jim Nichols" <jhnichols@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2008 18:01:58 -0500
That's the reason that I still have my F10.  They are hard to part with.

Jim Nichols
Tullahoma, TN USA
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Andrew Fildes" <afildes@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <olympus@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Monday, July 28, 2008 5:21 PM
Subject: [OM] Re: OT: F31fd Replacement


> 
> Yes - that comment bothered me too. I sold my Leica equivalent (D-Lux  
> 3) because although I liked the 16:9 native format, I couldn't stand  
> the noise. My F10 is a LOT better!
> Andrew Fildes
> afildes@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> 
> 
> 
> On 29/07/2008, at 8:05 AM, Moose wrote:
> 
>> I compared the ISO 100, 400, 800 and 1600 studio shots from dpreview.
>> Looking at shots of the same subject, full pixel, side by side, the  
>> LX2
>> is clearly two stops behind the F30 in noise performance.
> 
> 
> 
> ==============================================
> List usage info:     http://www.zuikoholic.com
> List nannies:        olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
> ==============================================
>


==============================================
List usage info:     http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies:        olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz