Very likely.
This is the problem inherent to 'tests' done outside of a strictly
controlled environment. Outdoor scenes like these are much more
interesting and can present a myriad of possibilities for comparison,
but if the light changes a bit or a subject moves, the value of the
test is compromised. Stationary subjects improve the chances of
getting useful shots.
>From what I'm seeing on screen, there is a difference in exposure.
Can't do it right now, but someone might want to open these in an
image editing program and compare values for a couple of the same
points in the pix.
ScottGee1
On 10/4/06, Winsor Crosby <wincros@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> I think the difference is just exposure.
>
>
> Winsor
> Long Beach, CA
> USA
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|