[OM] Re: More on digital vs. film by one of the Landscape masters

[Andrew Fildes]

Yeah - you'd never get the Virgin Mary intruding unexpectedly on  
digital prints, now would you?
AndrewF


On 31/07/2005, at 6:16 AM, R. Jackson wrote:

> The rationale seems to be that digital is "good enough" to get the
> job done, as long as the job isn't held up to very intense scrutiny.
> I'm sure Ansel Adams would be proud... ;-)



==============================================
List usage info:     http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies:        olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================