Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

[OM] Re: More on digital vs. film by one of the Landscape masters

Subject: [OM] Re: More on digital vs. film by one of the Landscape masters
From: AG Schnozz <agschnozz@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2005 15:54:49 -0700 (PDT)
> Is it just me? In those comparison crops between 4x5 and the
> C@non  
> there was really no comparison at all. The digital image
> looked hideous.

You just don't get it, do you?

Digital images = good
Film images = bad
Canon images = very good
All others = very bad.

It's part of our new reality.  If you say the lie that digital
is better often enough people will believe it.

In otherwords, JPEG artifacts are an improvement to the image.

Don't believe me?  MP3's are an improvement over CD quality
sound according to the masses.

AG


                
____________________________________________________
Start your day with Yahoo! - make it your home page 
http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs 
 

==============================================
List usage info:     http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies:        olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz