| Subject: | [OM] Re: More on digital vs. film by one of the Landscape masters |
|---|---|
| From: | <bs.pearce@xxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sat, 30 Jul 2005 22:18:10 -0500 |
> Digital images = good > Film images = bad > Canon images = very good > All others = very bad. Thus spake the Luminous Landscape. Seriously, there is quite a bit of good info on the site, but anyone that thinks the site is unbiased is delusional. Bill Pearce ============================================== List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx ============================================== |
| Previous by Date: | [OM] Re: Ok, so it was a little hyperbole, bs.pearce |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [OM] Re: More on digital vs. film by one of the Landscape masters, C.H.Ling |
| Previous by Thread: | [OM] Re: More on digital vs. film by one of the Landscape masters, R. Jackson |
| Next by Thread: | [OM] Re: More on digital vs. film by one of the Landscape masters, C.H.Ling |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |