[OM] Re: More on digital vs. film by one of the Landscape masters

[Chuck Norcutt]

I was also more than a bit surprised to see f/22 at 17mm.  I don't 
understand it at all.  It seems to me that it has diffraction effects 
written all over it.  Why?  At 17mm and landscape distances it certainly 
can't be for depth of field.

Chuck Norcutt

Jeff Keller wrote:
> 17mm at f22 ? Sounds like he thinks "large format". It's hard to imagine
> stopping down that much but maybe he wanted to be very close to the monument
> valley flower.


==============================================
List usage info:     http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies:        olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================