I just spotted S/N 133400 on that auction site #3867757450 with a $145 BIN
if anyone is interested.
No connection.
--
Piers
-----Original Message-----
From: olympus-owner@xxxxxxxxxx [mailto:olympus-owner@xxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf
Of AG Schnozz
Sent: 18 January 2005 05:20
To: olympus@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [OM] Re: 35mm Film
> > I think everybody here knows how I feel about the 100/2.8...
> I should have paid more attention to your feeling about this one.
It's OK.
> I had decided to buy a LN one, which was not silvernosed neither MC
I'm quite partial to the ones that are from that particular time period. The
early ones are pretty good, but those in the 110,000 to 125,000 serial
number range seem to have something unique going on. The later blacknosed,
multicoated versions just aren't the same thing. They changed the
formulation to be sharpest at different apertures than the earlier/mid
versions.
> Think that I hold on because I haven't yet resolved Zuiko's half stop
> difference between full aperture and next f stop, I mean between 2.8
> and 4 in this lens.
It bugged me for the first two or three weeks...
AG
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|