> I have the 100/2.8 and the 135/3.5. I understand the 135/2.8
> is very
> good; I really like the 100/2.8 because it's so small and
> convent. And
> it seems to produce good images.
The 100mm and 135mm focal lengths are worlds apart. Strangly
enough, the halfway point between 100mm and 200mm isn't 150mm,
but 135mm.
I've got a 135/3.5 which actually has been getting quite a bit
of use lately. The bokeh is not nearly as nice as the 100/2.8,
but when stopped down it takes excellent pictures.
I think everybody here knows how I feel about the 100/2.8...
AG-Schnozz
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail - You care about security. So do we.
http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|