I have a feeling that I agree with you, Ken. Except that I reject the Adobe
system and use Capture One Pro.
Chris
> On 2 Jan 20, at 23:23, Ken Norton <ken@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Ornament Moose wrote:
>> It's this idea that PS is somehow just a more powerful, but mysterious and
>> dangerous, step up from LR that leads to a
>> lot on confusion and frustration. They use fundamentally different paradigms
>> to approach image editing. Anyone
>> approaching PS as though it's just LR on steroids is likely to be frustrated
>> and miss out on the breadth of capabilities.
>
> EXACTLY!
>
> And this is precisely why I think you're hopelessly stuck in the old,
> obsolete paradigm. The thinking or approach of singular, stand-alone
> images with just some simple means of image organization (directories,
> by date or subject) is the old buggy-whip paradigm of image management
> and editing. PS is an awesome tool for a single image or composite. As
> a tool for handling a multi-image project, it is hopeless and
> completely pudgy. It's no different than a house. A house has a
> bedroom which is FANTASTIC for sleeping, a kitchen which is FANTASTIC
> for cooking, a bathroom which is FANTASTIC for reading and catching up
> on facebook, and closets for storage of clothes so they don't hung on
> the exercise bike or treadmill. PS is like that kitchen, which is
> where you want to do all your cooking and culinary artistry, but it's
> not the right place for sleeping, pooping and hanging clothes up.
> People, and I think Moose is somewhat guilty, try to use PS for things
> which it is very poorly designed.
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|