You nailed that one. That was a good day. Here is the exact same
critter (had never processed the scan) in a different pose. I like
yours better but I don't think I missed the focus on the wings.
On close inspection, I think a couple mm further back would be slightly
better.
http://www.olyendomike.com/Other/Moose-visit-Oct-2011/19697174_sTD2t3#!i=1830848902&k=j4BPsRs&lb=1&s=L
I'll chase 'em all day, Mike
On 5/4/2012 2:58 PM, usher99@xxxxxxx wrote:
> One person's kludge is another's bees knees. For static objects and
> macro the adapters seem fine.
True enough, if you add plenty of time available to static and macro.
Still, I wish Carol were a video maker when you, Marnie and I were
dancing
around a laggard Monarch Flutterby still
hanging around a field in Cogswell's Grant in mid October. I suspect we
looked
a right bunch of fools! :-)
That was the place for fast AF.
<http://galleries.moosemystic.net/MooseFoto/index.php?gallery=Travel/Nort
hEast_2011/Critters/Real&image=_MG_4659croofm.jpg>
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|