| Subject: | Re: [OM] OM-D EM-5 review at dpreview |
|---|---|
| From: | Chuck Norcutt <chucknorcutt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 04 May 2012 11:39:32 -0400 |
Significantly larger than 4/3 doesn't matter to me. Significantly smaller than full frame does. Chuck Norcutt On 5/4/2012 11:30 AM, Ken Norton wrote: > But the sensor in the NEX is significantly larger than the Four-Thirds > sensor. It's not really an IQ issue, but a lens crop-factor issue. > > AG -- _________________________________________________________________ Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/ Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/ |
| Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] Question for you experts, Chuck Norcutt |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [OM] OM-D EM-5 review at dpreview, Chuck Norcutt |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] OM-D EM-5 review at dpreview, Ken Norton |
| Next by Thread: | [OM] OM-D EM-5 review at dpreview, usher99 |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |