If you shoot raw white balance, JPEG noise and sharpening problems don't
exist.
Chuck Norcutt
On 9/17/2010 1:23 PM, David Irisarri wrote:
> Yeah Ken,
>
> I also think is a superb camera. Pansonic is on the right way but there are
> several fields that need to be fine-tuned.
>
> Olympus exposure meter is more reliable than Panasonic one.
> Olympus WB copes with more difficult situations.
> TruePIC engine outputs the best JPGs in the market, noise reduction
> algorithms are far better than Panasonic ones. Sharpening is also better
> than Panasonic "less haloes".
> Gradation is much better in Olympus.
> Colour, and lets leave the word "accuracy" apart, it´s more pleasant in
> Olympus cameras.
>
> Dave
>
> 2010/9/17 Ken Norton<ken@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>
>> The GH2 specs are actually very close to what my predictions were for
>> the other recently named camera as I had expected both to use the same
>> sensor.
>>
>> The GH2 is a fascinating camera. I REALLY like the GH1 and the GH2
>> adds several things which I find desirable--including the
>> touch-screen. If I was in the market for a new 43/m43 camera right
>> now, the GH2 would top my list.
>>
>> AG
>> --
>> _________________________________________________________________
>> Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
>> Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
>> Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
>>
>>
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|