Yeah Ken,
I also think is a superb camera. Pansonic is on the right way but there are
several fields that need to be fine-tuned.
Olympus exposure meter is more reliable than Panasonic one.
Olympus WB copes with more difficult situations.
TruePIC engine outputs the best JPGs in the market, noise reduction
algorithms are far better than Panasonic ones. Sharpening is also better
than Panasonic "less haloes".
Gradation is much better in Olympus.
Colour, and lets leave the word "accuracy" apart, it´s more pleasant in
Olympus cameras.
Dave
2010/9/17 Ken Norton <ken@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> The GH2 specs are actually very close to what my predictions were for
> the other recently named camera as I had expected both to use the same
> sensor.
>
> The GH2 is a fascinating camera. I REALLY like the GH1 and the GH2
> adds several things which I find desirable--including the
> touch-screen. If I was in the market for a new 43/m43 camera right
> now, the GH2 would top my list.
>
> AG
> --
> _________________________________________________________________
> Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
> Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
> Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
>
>
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|