Olympus-OM

[Top] [All Lists]
<prev [Date] next> <prev [Thread] next>

[OM] Re: The Shock of Influence

from Chuck Norcutt
Subject: [OM] Re: The Shock of Influence
From: Chuck Norcutt <chucknorcutt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2007 15:25:38 -0400 
Statistically, you didn't have an example since you had no demonstrable 
data.  :-)

Chuck Norcutt


Sandy Harris wrote:
>
> However, as a previous post said, their methods are quite
> dubious by the standard statistical criteria for research and,
> as I think my example showed, sometimes  they get it
> quite wrong.

==============================================
List usage info:     http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies:        olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date:  [OM] Re: The Shock of Influence, Walt Wayman
Next by Date:  [OM] Re: Free to good home/homes, Chuck Norcutt
Previous by Thread:  [OM] Re: The Shock of Influence, Geilfuss Charles
Next by Thread:  [OM] Re: The Shock of Influence, Winsor Crosby
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]