Winsor Crosby wrote:
> I suspect they will be close in price. I think I am less interested
> as they both seem to be aimed at the photographer who goes out and
> shoots a thousand images in a day. PS and Bridge are just fine for
> me. I just worry that Adobe will somehow make Bridge less capable and
> make both Lightroom and PS CS3 the "photographers package".
>
I haven't been all that happy with Bridge. It's slow to load, to read
and display EXIF and there is no was to see images large without loading
them into PS.
I've started using FastStone Viewer instead, and really like it. It's
much faster and has many more viewing options. You can put in which
program to open the image in. Just select the image(s) you want, type E
and it opens in PSCS at least as quickly as from Bridge.
Moose
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|