No that is not good, there is always dpreview for that, In fact I got
fed up of my car site because people where asking about the next model
before the current one had hit the forecourt, If we were gadjet crazy (
I don't think zuiko = gadjet) then we wouldn't be using OM gear - or
would we ;-)
IMHO Technology is sometimes and improvement, but not always and it
certainly doesn't need to develop so fast.
And to bring it on topic - a picture, taken with all om gear fuji slide
film and managed to get a reasonable though not great scan from the 2700F
http://thattimeoflife.smugmug.com/photos/36128733-L.jpg
NSURIT@xxxxxxx wrote:
>
> In a message dated 9/15/2005 6:23:38 A.M. Central Daylight Time,
> peterleyssens@xxxxxxxxx writes:
>
> What we urgently need is an announcement from Olympus, so everybody can
> whine about that. "Not enough megapixels ! No motion compensation !
> Doesn't make my coffee ! Too expensive ! Doesn't include the SUV !"
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Peter, I think you are on to something. Do you think we are acting like a
> bunch of bored kids locked inside because its raining outside? Bill Barber
>
>
> ==============================================
> List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
> List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
> ==============================================
>
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|
