It's single coated or multicoated?
Alfredo
On Aug 24, 2005, at 5:51 PM, C.H.Ling wrote:
>
> Did the Nikon 17-35 run on FF digital sensor? Many lenses perform well
> in
> film does not mean it also perform well with image sensor. OM 85/2
> works
> very well wide open with film but when using on E-1, it has serious
> chroma,
> has to stop down to F4 to minimize the problem.
>
> But I agree the mount size has nothing to do with lens design, they are
> already large enough.
>
> C.H.Ling
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Winsor Crosby" <wincros@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>>
>> It is possible. One of the first things Nikon did after bringing out
>> the D1 was to start redesigning its wide angle lenses. The first one
>> was the 17-35 which is considered to be one of their all time great
>> lenses. It is a lens for digital with 35 mm coverage, telecentric
>> with no color fringing, CA or dark corners. Nikon has the smallest
>> mount. I am afraid that mount size, in spite of what Olympus said in
>> the marketing of their new camera, has nothing to do with it, or at
>> least no other maker's mount had insufficient size to have a
>> telecentric design.
>>
>
>
>
> ==============================================
> List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
> List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
> ==============================================
>
___________________________________
Yahoo! Mail: gratis 1GB per i messaggi e allegati da 10MB
http://mail.yahoo.it
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|