In a message dated 8/23/2005 3:03:58 A.M. Central Daylight Time,
scharfsj@xxxxxxxxxxxxx writes:
Understandably the E-1 would cost less with the lenses you describe,
but you wouldn't be getting 12.8 megapixels in a full-frame sensor,
or the noise performance of the Canon DigicII/CMOS technology. For
pros who need the detail, 5 megapixels on a 4/3 sensor won't cut it.
Canon knows exactly who they are targeting this camera for.
I see where they were coming from and for the pro who needs an extra body,
primarily for studio work it is a good choice. For my purposes, and I would
suggest that of most of this groups members, the e-1 is a much better choice.
It might even be a good choice for some pros depending on their
requirements. Bill Barber
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|