| Subject: | Re: [OM] Which OM body? |
|---|---|
| From: | "R. Jackson" <jackson.robert.r@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 11 Dec 2002 19:25:33 -0800 |
I'm of the opinion that the great OM backup body would have to be an
OM-1n. It has mirror lockup ability, it's extremely power-efficient,
cost-effective and seems impervious to most changes in temperature or
humidity.
-Rob < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List > < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html > |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] Damned with faint praise?, John A. Lind |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | RE: [OM] winder cable/remote?, Gary L. Edwards |
| Previous by Thread: | [OM] Which OM body?, Chuck Norcutt |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] Which OM body?, Albert |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |