| Subject: | RE: [OM] 28/2 or 35/2? |
|---|---|
| From: | "Robert Gries" <rgg@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 29 Jul 2002 15:50:10 -0500 |
There's another list member who swears by this lens. I guess I have to see it to believe it. <snip> Bite your tongue... That's a sweet lens. Perfect for the ultimate light kit (one lens). <snip> but an f4 aperture? that's almost pinhole! ;) < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List > < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html > |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | RE: [OM] 28/2 or 35/2?, Timpe, Jim |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [OM] OM-1N and 625A battery, David Bülow-Osborne |
| Previous by Thread: | RE: [OM] 28/2 or 35/2?, Timpe, Jim |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] 28/2 or 35/2?, Jim Couch |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |