I just really like the view of a 24. I actually sold my 24 f/2, but not
becasue of poor performance. I do not use the f/2 aperature very often, and
the 24 f/2.8 is more compact and uses 49mm filters. (It is also less
expensive!)
Jim Couch
Robert Gries wrote:
> Ah, yes. Though that sounds like a good combo, I can't justify upwards
> of $500 for the 40/2!
>
> I am very interested to see the support for the 24/2. I always heard
> mediocre things about it, but I guess a lot of people like it!
>
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|