Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: [OM] 28/2 or 35/2?

Subject: RE: [OM] 28/2 or 35/2?
From: "Larry J. Clark" <ljclark@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2002 20:13:56 -0400
With the balancing 85mm, I'd go for the 35mm.  I was seldom happy with
28mm -- not wide enough and only had one the first system I owned (Nikon F
and OM had/have 24mm).  I like 24mm MUCH better, once you learned to control
it a bit.  The 35mm will keep you from thinking too wide, until you buy a
Voigtlander with a 21mm or 15mm.



> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Robert Gries
> Sent: Monday, July 29, 2002 2:50 PM
> To: olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [OM] 28/2 or 35/2?
>
>
> In a steel cage death match, which one would you choose as the obvious
> winner?
>
> Any experience with these lenses?  Also, what other lenses would you use
> to compliment it?  I am thinking of the "minimal" kit of an OM-1n, 85/2,
> and ???
>
>
> < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
> < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
> < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
>
>


< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz