| Subject: | RE: [OM] 28/2 or 35/2? |
|---|---|
| From: | "Timpe, Jim" <Jim.Timpe@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 29 Jul 2002 13:22:59 -0700 |
No, Robert, that's what the 40mm is for...... -----Original Message----- From: Robert Gries ..... and I worry that the 35 is too close to the 50.... < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List > < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html > |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | RE: [OM] Deutscher Motor Sport Bund, Robert Gries |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [OM] 28/2 or 35/2?, NSURIT |
| Previous by Thread: | [OM] ...... 28/2 or 35/2?....., TMLee |
| Next by Thread: | RE: [OM] 28/2 or 35/2?, Robert Gries |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |