Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

[OM] 28/2 or 35/2?

Subject: [OM] 28/2 or 35/2?
From: "Andy Gilbert" <gilbs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2002 00:05:27 +0100
***Original Messages***
Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2002 15:33:47 -0500
From: "Robert Gries" <rgg@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: [OM] 28/2 or 35/2?

I've heard rumor that the 28 is sharper than the 35 - any comments?

<snip>

I guess my question could also be: is the 35/2 and 85/2 an adequate
range?  Would you rather have the (21)-28-50-85 combo, or the 21-35-85?

<snip>



The 28/2 is generally regarded as the better lens, having both I tend to
agree.  OK, so I don't need both but do tend to use them both, and together
when I've got room to carry them.  The 35 goes well with an 85, if you can
only take 2 lenses, ideal for social occasions. 21/35/85 is good too, though
the 21 is still quite new to me.  Personally I need faster lenses now  as my
eyesight is failing me.  The extra cost will eventually be recouped in less
wasted film, or so I told the CFO ;)

Andy Gilbert
Exeter
Devon
England


< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz