| Subject: | RE: [OM] 28/2 or 35/2? |
|---|---|
| From: | "Robert Gries" <rgg@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 29 Jul 2002 18:04:20 -0500 |
Ooh! Now that is a good excuse! <snip> The extra cost will eventually be recouped in less wasted film, or so I told the CFO ;) < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List > < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html > |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [OM] Oly Macro, Robert Gries |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [OM] 28/2 or 35/2?, Tom Scales |
| Previous by Thread: | [OM] 28/2 or 35/2?, Andy Gilbert |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] 28/2 or 35/2?, C.H.Ling |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |