Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] Difference Between the 50mm Zuiko Lenses

Subject: Re: [OM] Difference Between the 50mm Zuiko Lenses
From: "Richard F. Man" <richard@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2001 00:49:08 -0800
At 02:46 AM 11/15/2001 -0500, you wrote:
Okay, the other day I was discussing my perception of a lack of sharpness in
the 28mm /f3.5 and two people chimed in assuring me that their examples were
excellent.  (I think one lister used the word "superb".)
...

hehe, in the same vein, I got the feelings that w/ few exceptions, almost any Zuikos, especially the prime lens, is said to be "you'll never regret owning it" by at least one list member. Then again, that's make us Zuikoholic, I guess.

So far, I am really glad to have the 90/2, 180/2.8. Have not used the 35/shift much yet, and something about that 24/2.8 bothers me a bit. the 50/1.4 is OK, and the 135/2.8 is too new. (and the 200/4 is coming) - gad, they are multiplying!!!



// richard http://www.imagecraft.com
[ For technical support, please include all previous replies in your msgs. ]


< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz