I say, I hit C. H.'s button!
----- Original Message -----
From: "C.H.Ling" <chling@xxxxxxxxxx>
To: <olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 8:56 PM
Subject: Re: [OM] Difference Between the 50mm Zuiko Lenses
> Japanese quality? No question it could be one of the best in the
> world. But I had bought a Panasonic VCR (Made in Japan) in early 90'
> that fail to tune up to any station. When I return the unit the sales
> had not ask any question (not usual in Hong Kong at that time, they
> usually ask a lot of question just try to reject your return), the
> salesman admit it was a common failure of the model.
>
> Our OM-10 has oil magnet problem, the 35-70/3.6 that designed to be a
> high quality zoom lens but all I have seen (over five) were very poor
> mechanically, they have also used some poor rubber that crack more
> easily than the other Zuikos. The focusing is not smooth (without a
> constant force), the lens element also has separation problem. The OM4
> and OM3 has battery drain problem, some were better and some were very
> poor. Just named a few example.
>
> Back to the statistical process control your guy mentioned. You think
> quality control is that simple? I have been in electronic
> manufacturing for around 18 years. For manufacturing quality, nothing
> is perfect and 100% accurate, not every product is the same. There is
> an acceptance "range". Whenever the product quality is fall into that
> range it is okay to ship. You cannot adjust the production tool every
> minute. There is no question that some of you will not understand.
>
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|