Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] 50 1.2 at Cameta

Subject: Re: [OM] 50 1.2 at Cameta
From: Tris Schuler <tristanjohn@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2001 17:43:46 -0700
Well of course it's the last resort. Common sense dictates that first you try to iron it out with the vendor. In this case, the consumer could not. But then he didn't follow through in his own behalf. That's unfortunate. And dumb. Worse, it keeps outfits like Cameta free to continue these shady practices--actually encourages them to do so.

"Eat it" referred to the loss on the deal--time, bad energy and money.

I take this story to be true. If any grain of it were true it'd be enough for me. Even had Cameta made it right by fully reimbursing Oben for his monetary investment I'd look on Cameta askance. You don't send a lens that bad to anyone, not under any circumstance. It just doesn't happen. Not with professionals. In this case it is clear to me that Cameta is one dubious concern. How anyone could come away with any other impression is quite beyond me.

But to be fair I shall turn it around. Based on Oben's representation here, would you be willing to do business with Cameta Camera tomorrow?

Finally, you are entirely mistaken that this does not affect you. It affects everyone in photography. Wake up!

Tris



At 09:26 PM 7/24/01 +0100, you wrote:
Well, this is why it helps to know your rights as a consumer before you enter into dealings with unknown vendors, especially when these vendors are out of the country.

snip

I don't know the specifics of consumer laws in your country and how they might bear in this particular, but I'd bet dollars to doughnuts your cc bank provider would have supported you on this to the hilt with 1) a simple phone call and 2) a letter in support of your complaint (along with any supporting documentation, say, a short estimate of repair from the Olympus tech w/explanation of problem, a facsimile of any email correspondence with Cameta Camera re the condition of the lens prior to purchase, etc.).

I have found that merely threatening the delinquent trader with a complaint to VISA or MC will persuade them to see things your way ... if you are in the right of course. They don't want to earn bad marks with the VISA organisation. This worked for me last year with a boating company in France (I paid with VISA over email from the Netherlands). What you are describing is, for me, the last resort.

If any of that represents a "problem" to you then, of course, you're free to eat it. But please keep

... eat what?  Foreign banter I' afraid.

For my part, I am as of this second crossing Cameta Camera off my list. Before I delete it from my

... this, on the basis of hearsay, or supposition that Oben's lens is the same one? Or have members of the List had bad experiences with Cameta before? I know that Cambridge Camera has been the subject of many unfavourable reports from US citizens. It does not affect me as the dollar/GBP rate is pretty unfavourable at present, so I am unlikely to buy anything from across the water for a while.

Chris
--
___________
???>-}
C M I Barker
Gamlingay, Cambridgeshire, Great Britain
mailto:imagopus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
mailto:chris_barker@xxxxxxxxx
YaC tel: +44 (0)7092 251126

< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz