| Subject: | Re: [OM] Least Useful/Used Oly Piece |
|---|---|
| From: | "Giles" <cnocbui@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 23 Oct 2000 16:28:54 +0000 |
It was I. Giles John A. Lind wrote: > >smaller than f/4.0 but, as John Lind once wrote, this lens deserves a > >dog collar! > > Hmmmm, I didn't write that (never used one), but based on others' remarks > I wouldn't disagree with it. Must be some other "John" on the list. < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List > < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html > |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] OM-3Ti, Giles |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [OM] Vibrations on OM-1, Giles |
| Previous by Thread: | [OM] 35mm vs. medium format heresies, Winsor Crosby |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] Least Useful/Used Oly Piece, Ray Moth |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |