all three. 85/90 macro and all flavors of 100 are among my favorite zuikos.
never head of deliberate coma and it is not anywhere in my massive stack of oly
literature
Sent from my iPhone
> On Sep 23, 2022, at 3:54 PM, Stephen Troy <sctroy60@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Regarding the 85/2 and 100/2 - if I remember my brother's comments
> correctly (he's a pro photographer), both are great lenses but you have to
> use the right one for the right purpose. The 85/2 is indeed a stellar
> portrait lens, and a very good one. The 100/2 is amazingly sharp and
> contrasty and makes a terrible portrait lens. My brother said something
> along the lines of "the 100 is so sharp and contrasty that it will show
> every pore and wrinkle. NOT a good portrait lens" but a great lens when
> you need sharpness and contrast. For pleasing portraits, the 85 is the way
> to go. Both were favorites of his.
>
> Steve Troy
>
>> On Fri, Sep 23, 2022 at 6:29 PM Wayne Shumaker <om3ti@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>>
>> Just looking at what OM lenses would be of interest now that sharpness is
>> no longer my end-all to creative photography.
>>
>> WayneS
>>
>>
> --
> _________________________________________________________________
> Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
> Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
> Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
>
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|