Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] IMG: Mockingbird, Then and Now

Subject: Re: [OM] IMG: Mockingbird, Then and Now
From: "philippe.amard" <philippe.amard@xxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 7 Jan 2014 20:12:41 +0100
I like your approach Bob
Thanks for the input :-)

Amities
Philippe


Le 7 janv. 14 à 17:47, Bob Whitmire a écrit :

> I don't use ACR anymore, but I do use LR5, which is the same thing  
> in a different package. The tools in LR are arranged in what Adobe  
> thinks is the preferred order for post processing, but I differ with  
> them enough so that I'm hopping up and down the left side of the  
> screen throughout the process.
> Step one is easy enough: more or less correct exposure, black and  
> white points. Then all the way to the bottom for camera profiles.  
> Adobe Standard is the default, and for a lot of cameras, including  
> my Fuji X-100s, the only choice. I have a variety of choices for the  
> Nikon, and I almost always use Nikon's Camera Standard for the D800,  
> with an occasional nod to Camera Landscape or Camera Portrait. Each  
> makes subtle adjustments that can make the difference in the image.
>
> Then I do the lens profile corrections, which sometimes mess with  
> overall exposure, which is why I don't try to nail down exposure in  
> step one. After profile corrections, I go back to the top panel and  
> start moving sliders. I rarely use LCE in Photoshop anymore because  
> LR5's Clarity slider nails it pretty good. If I don't want it over  
> the whole image, I just use the LR brush and mask what I want to  
> clarify and let it rip. My usual technique is to slide too far and  
> heat the image up, then back it down to what looks right.
>
> Toward the end of the process I sharpen the image, and then do noise  
> reduction. Sometimes it's a back and forth thing, with a little  
> sharpen, some NR, more sharpening, more NR, etc. The other sliders  
> come into play, too. Detail, masking, etc., all have their roles to  
> play. Okay, sometimes I do NR before I sharpen. Have not yet  
> determined which is most effective, though I tend to prefer  
> sharpening then NR.
>
> Finally, and especially if the image is to be printed on matte  
> paper, I will soft proof. Since LR added the soft proof feature, I  
> usually make do with that. Sometimes I'll go do it in Photoshop as  
> the curves control is so much more precise. Soft proofing is still a  
> Kentucky windage thing, however, because if you check the paper  
> emulation box, the result is far too aggressive. If you don't check  
> the box, you don't get a true representation of what the image will  
> look like on paper. If I had a gauge, I'd guesstimate the correct  
> effect lies about a third of the way between not checking the paper  
> emulation box and checking it.
>
> Finally, soft proofing will show you out of gamut colors, or try to,  
> which can be important when printing to matte paper, which doesn't  
> have the DR of luster or glossy papers. But like the paper  
> emulation, the out of gamut is too aggressive, so the end effect is  
> that you have to putter around enough to more or less know where to  
> set the controls. (I don't always soft proof for luster or glossy  
> papers because what comes out of the printer is so close to what's  
> on the monitor.)
>
> Sorry if that's TMI. Sometimes I get carried away.
>
> --Bob Whitmire
> Certified Neanderthal
>
> On Jan 7, 2014, at 10:56 AM, Chuck Norcutt wrote:
>
>> I've always assumed that ACR NR was the
>> first processing step.  On reflection that may not be right since I
>> think the tools are typically arranged in the tabs according to  
>> order of
>> usage (ignoring iterative back and forth).  Maybe I have to adjust my
>> total workflow to use NR after exposure adjustments.
>
> -- 
> _________________________________________________________________
> Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
> Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
> Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/

One sees clearly only with the heart. What is essential is invisible  
to the eye. Antoine de Saint Exupéry in Le Petit Prince.
NO ARCHIVE




-- 
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz