I have been using Vuescan for 7+ years. I know Vuescan pretty well.
Thank you very much. When I was shooting 60 rolls a year, all of them
were scanned using Vuescan.
For most subjects, it work quite well, but for foliage, it's just
weird. he B&W neg white balance is crap. I have tried "Generic Color"
and "Kodak Tmax-Tmax400" (which is the film I use), and both look
weird. My monitor is profiled, it's a Eizo Coloredge CE240W, one of
the better true color monitor around.
Normally I adjust it in Lightroom. I like the glow effect so I didn't
bother but when I made the darkroom, I adjusted it to taste. I'd
properly go back in and make a lighter print and see what it looks
like too.
There is something about this list. People just assume others are
idiots or something.
On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 9:24 PM, Wayne Harridge
<wayneharridge@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>> Richard Man <richard.lists@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> Um, Moose, I am exposing to get the details of the redwood :-)
>>
>> The foliage does look brighter though. I think that's a vuescan
>> artifact.
>
> Then I'd suggest that is something about the way you are using vuescan rather
> than an inherent "feature" of the product.
>
--
// richard m: richard @imagecraft.com
// w: http://www.imagecraft.com/pub/Portfolio09/ blog:
http://rfman.wordpress.com
// book: http://www.blurb.com/bookstore/detail/745963
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|