Re: [OM] Lightroom?

[Philippe Amard]

ditto
phx


Nathan Wajsman wrote:

>I used PS since some time in the 90s and got fed up with its  
>proliferation of features that might have been useful to Stalin back  
>in the 1930s but which had no interest for me. Then Adobe came out  
>with Lightroom and all was well.
>
>Nathan
>
>Nathan Wajsman
>Alicante, Spain
>http://www.frozenlight.eu
>http://www.greatpix.eu
>http://www.nathanfoto.com
>
>Books: http://www.blurb.com/bookstore/search?search=wajsman&x=0&y=0
>PICTURE OF THE WEEK: http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws
>Blog: http://www.fotocycle.dk/blog
>
>
>
>On Nov 3, 2009, at 9:19 PM, Sue Pearce wrote:
>
>  
>
>>Same here--15000 files now and I would not dream of using anything
>>else. I do have PS but only use it for stitching panoramas.
>>
>>Nathan
>>
>>I suspect what we have here is the contrast betweeen people that  
>>used ps
>>just a bit or not at all before trying lightroom, and those who have  
>>a fair
>>amount of time over a fair number of versions of PS.
>>
>>And honestly, I find the filing part incomprehensible.
>>
>>Bill Pearce
>>
>>-- 
>>_________________________________________________________________
>>Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
>>Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
>>Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
>>
>>
>>    
>>
>
>  
>
-- 
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/