Re: [OM] Lightroom?

[Moose]

Andrew Fildes wrote:
> Not if you're buying academic versions! :-)
>   

But I am no version of an academic.

> But think on it - once upon a time you'd spend that kind of money without a 
> whimper 

Did so!
(Whimper, that is.)

> on a new lens to improve your pix plus a serious premium for pro-grade film 
> and processing. And you had expensive  
> lenses you hardly used. Now we just have to shift our thinking to fewer 
> lenses and greater expense on the post-production end. Yes, it's still a rip 
> off but it's also a just shift in emphasis.
>   

I don't really disagree. But LR still isn't worth the money - to me. 
Just like the many film era pieces of equipment that I would have liked 
to have, but didn't.

Moose
-- 
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/