The 510 has two IS options, regular and horizontal. Vertical was added in
the 520.
Jim Nichols
Tullahoma, TN USA
----- Original Message -----
From: "Andrew Fildes" <afildes@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <olympus@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Friday, July 25, 2008 6:13 PM
Subject: [OM] Re: E-420 vs 520...is IS worthwhile?
>
> However, as the 520 has a hard IS button it is easy to change quickly.
> And it has three IS options too - regular, horizontal and vertical
> panning. Did the 510 have that?
> The thing I noticed with it was that when handed one that had been
> used for training (had a sticker on the bottom that said 'Training')
> I was really easy to sit for two minutes and set it up the way I
> wanted it - things like changing to 'Natural', No Noise Reduction, No
> Sharpening' and so on.
> Andrew Fildes
> afildes@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
>
> On 26/07/2008, at 6:20 AM, Richard Man wrote:
>
>> Of course, just like if you are panning etc. You do need to know the
>> limitations of a technology :-)
>>
>> At 01:10 PM 7/25/2008, Scott Peden wrote:
>>
>>> As I understand, the IS is a problem when using a tripod.
>>>
>>> With the 510 and the 70-300 a person on another group sent in
>>> three pics,
>>> all tripod of the same three different subjects, all on tripods,
>>> one with IS
>>> the other without. The ones with IS were a bit fuzzier the moment
>>> you opened
>>> the picture all the way up, I noticed the difference when the pics
>>> were
>>> 1/3rd screen size.
>>
>> // richard (This email is for mailing lists. To reach me directly,
>> please use richard at imagecraft.com)
>>
>>
>
>
> ==============================================
> List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
> List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
> ==============================================
>
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|