Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

[OM] Re: E-420 vs 520...is IS worthwhile?

Subject: [OM] Re: E-420 vs 520...is IS worthwhile?
From: Richard Man <richard-lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2008 13:20:25 -0700
Of course, just like if you are panning etc. You do need to know the 
limitations of a technology :-)

At 01:10 PM 7/25/2008, Scott  Peden wrote:

>As I understand, the IS is a problem when using a tripod.
>
>With the 510 and the 70-300 a person on another group sent in three pics,
>all tripod of the same three different subjects, all on tripods, one with IS
>the other without. The ones with IS were a bit fuzzier the moment you opened
>the picture all the way up, I noticed the difference when the pics were
>1/3rd screen size.

// richard (This email is for mailing lists. To reach me directly, 
please use richard at imagecraft.com) 


==============================================
List usage info:     http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies:        olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz