Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

[OM] Re: E-420 vs 520...is IS worthwhile?

Subject: [OM] Re: E-420 vs 520...is IS worthwhile?
From: Andrew Fildes <afildes@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 26 Jul 2008 09:13:20 +1000
However, as the 520 has a hard IS button it is easy to change quickly.
And it has three IS options too - regular, horizontal and vertical  
panning. Did the 510 have that?
The thing I noticed with it was that when handed one that had been  
used for training (had a sticker on the bottom that said 'Training')  
I was really easy to sit for two minutes and set it up the way I  
wanted it - things like changing to 'Natural', No Noise Reduction, No  
Sharpening' and so on.
Andrew Fildes
afildes@xxxxxxxxxxxxx



On 26/07/2008, at 6:20 AM, Richard Man wrote:

> Of course, just like if you are panning etc. You do need to know the
> limitations of a technology :-)
>
> At 01:10 PM 7/25/2008, Scott  Peden wrote:
>
>> As I understand, the IS is a problem when using a tripod.
>>
>> With the 510 and the 70-300 a person on another group sent in  
>> three pics,
>> all tripod of the same three different subjects, all on tripods,  
>> one with IS
>> the other without. The ones with IS were a bit fuzzier the moment  
>> you opened
>> the picture all the way up, I noticed the difference when the pics  
>> were
>> 1/3rd screen size.
>
> // richard (This email is for mailing lists. To reach me directly,
> please use richard at imagecraft.com)
>
>


==============================================
List usage info:     http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies:        olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz