Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

[OM] Re: Old cameras, photos and restoration [was which one ?]

Subject: [OM] Re: Old cameras, photos and restoration [was which one ?]
From: Chuck Norcutt <chucknorcutt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2008 09:20:11 -0400
Your response caused me to look up the specs of flashbulbs of the day. 
The GE #5 or Sylvnia Press 25 had guide numbers of 200 feet at ASA 100. 
  That's about the same as two T45s. 
<http://www.graflex.org/flash/technical.html>

Chuck Norcutt

Ken Norton wrote:
> Dr Flash wrote:
>> Aunt Annie's wedding dinner photo really is amazing on many levels.
>> There is no way the DOF could be so great on a large format camera
>> unless the camera was capable of tilt or swing.  Also, given the small
>> apertures of a large camera, the slow speed of film of the day and no
>> apparent subject motion I would have to assume that flash was used.
> 
> First of all, I believe that the photograph is consistant with a quality 4x5
> camera of the time.  8x10 was certainly used, but almost exclusively for
> contact-prints.  4x5, even on the films of the day, was capable of
> tremendous detail and smoothness.  The edge-to-edge sharpness indicates a
> reasonable aperture and a tilted lens to increase the DoF.
> 
>> However, I can't find much indication of that in the shadows although
>> there certainly is some (see, especially, the lower left corner).
>> Another amazing point is that I can't find anyone blinking.  I can find
>> a few women not looking at the camera who may have their eyes closed but
>> no one looking at the camera whose eyes are not open.  Makes me wish I
>> could talk to that photographer.
> 
> I'm stewing on the lighting too.  It looks barebulb, but there are telltails
> of flash-powder. In the 100% view, you can see the lady's arm/hand move.
> She may have flinched during the exposure, but this may be the clue that it
> was flash-powder, because the duration of the flash lighting would have been
> extensive.
> 
> No eyes closed?  I'm more inclined to believe the photo was touched-up.
> (Editing didn't begin with Photoshop).
> 
> Regardless, it is an amazing photograph and one which I'm not so sure I'd
> have a clue how to replicate today and achieve the same level of quality.
> 
> AG
> 
> 
> ken@xxxxxxxxxxx
> http://www.zone-10.com
> 
> 
> ==============================================
> List usage info:     http://www.zuikoholic.com
> List nannies:        olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
> ==============================================
> 
> 
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com 
> Version: 8.0.138 / Virus Database: 270.4.10/1551 - Release Date: 7/14/2008 
> 6:49 AM
> 
> 
> 

==============================================
List usage info:     http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies:        olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz