Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

[OM] Re: Rumour has it...

Subject: [OM] Re: Rumour has it...
From: "Scott Peden" <scotpeden@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 17 Feb 2007 23:54:36 -0800
The C-5050 used, what I felt, was a lot of juice, the E-500 uses almost
nothing in comparison. The C-5050 also had to use juice to move the lens in
and out where as the DSLR zoom is done by hand.

-----Original Message-----
From: olympus-owner@xxxxxxxxxx [mailto:olympus-owner@xxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf
Of C.H.Ling
Sent: Saturday, February 17, 2007 11:32 PM
To: olympus@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [OM] Re: Rumour has it...


 It is not a good comparison for the ancient C5050 to the much newer E500. 
My E-1 consume 2x the power compared to the E300 with the same battery.

C.H.Ling

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Scott Peden"


>
> The Li Ion's last loads longer than the NiMi's.
>
> My 1500 Oly for the E-500 lasts 5 ties longer than a set of 2700 NiMi's in
> the C-5050.
>
> A 2700 mAh NiMi external battery pack lasts only about 2/3rds the run time
> of the 2200 Li Ion 2200 mAh external battery pack, from the same company.
>
> I don't know why, but the Li Ions are likely 50% to 80% longer run than
> their NiMi counterparts. That is, the 2200 Li Ion lasts as long as a 4300
> mAh Ni Mi battery, easily.
>
> I have observed this many times over the last 4 years of using those NiMi
> and Li Ion battery packs.
>
> Scott


==============================================
List usage info:     http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies:        olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================


==============================================
List usage info:     http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies:        olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz