Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

[OM] Re: olympus Digest V3 #315

Subject: [OM] Re: olympus Digest V3 #315
From: Stephen Scharf <scharfsj@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2006 20:22:22 -0800
Like you, Keith, I was a bit peeved when Apple went over to the dark  
side
with Intel, but having owned my MacBook for 6 mos. now, I can tell  
you these
chips work great.

Besides, the Intel migration is a done deal. 'Nuff said, so to speak,  
as far asSteve Jobs
is concerned.

-Stephen
On Nov 20, 2006, at 6:20 PM, Listar wrote:

>
> Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2006 04:26:34 -0800
> From: keith_w <keith_w@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: [OM] Re: **SPAM** Re: iMac for Workflow
>
> Tom Scales wrote:
>> That was my point.  There is no Intel compiled version for the Mac  
>> yet and
>> they've said CS2 never will be.
>
> Which brings up a thought or two...
> I have no need for a Windows OS on my Mac, and will very likely  
> never do
> so, so why would I even want an Intel Mac?
> My understanding of Mac's plans for the future mean they are never  
> going
> to offer a NON-Intel Mac again. They'll all have the Intel chip in   
> them.
>
> I suppose it doesn't matter ~ maybe ~ as if I do get an Intel Mac
> sometime in the future, that doesn't mean I MUST install a Windows  
> OS on
> it, does it.
> So, maybe I'm concerned unnecessarily.
> Still, it sits uneasily on me.
> I don't WANT an Intel chip, but all future Macs will [reported ly] be
> supplied with them...
>
> Dialog?
>
> keith whaley



==============================================
List usage info:     http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies:        olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz