Well, see, there ya go. :-)
After reading that I feel like everything I have is prehistoric or just
simply not any good and should just be sent to the trash heap. OK,
semi-kidding.
I knew, knew, knew someone would ask me where I read that...and I know I
haveread it over and over again in forums and some literature. But what this
link says and what I see on my computer screen confirms that adobeRGB is
flatter looking. Perhaps this is the issue...it could well be that the
imagesI've processed in RSE before and liked were shot with in camera
settings at SRGB, and these that I am having trouble with were shot at Adobe
RGB. Could my problem be that simple?
Thanx for the link, Scott.
Candace
ScottGee1 wrote: Where did you read that? It's true ONLY if everything else
in the chain is Adobe RGB. Which it rarely is. sRGB is the de facto standard
for the industry. Adobe RBG, when plugged into that produces dull, flat
results. This article does a pretty good job of summing it up:
http://www.shootsmarter.com/monitorcentral.html[1] Please advise any
questions. ScottGee1 On 10/20/06, Candace Lemarr <CandaceRocks@xxxxxxxxxxx>[2]
wrote: Another thought...does it matter? I have my cameras set to "adobe
RGB". Having read several places that this is the better way to go...true?
False? ============================================== List usage info:
http://www.zuikoholic.com[3] List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx[4]
==============================================
--- Links ---
1 http://www.shootsmarter.com/monitorcentral.html
2 mailto:CandaceRocks@xxxxxxxxxxx
3 http://www.zuikoholic.com
4 mailto:olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|