For someone not afraid of mushrooms, this has been a genuine Fang:
7631894655.
Initially, there was no BIN, and the starting price was 99 USD. Apparently
the buyer and seller agreed to add a BIN price and get it over with.
Good for them, sad for me that I hadn't taken that initiative :(
Cheers,
Bart
On 6/30/06, Mostly <mostly5@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>
> Bill,
>
> It was indeed a 2.0. While the ad copy said 2.8, it also mentioned the
> serial number of the lens that matched the one in the photos of the thing
> on
> the page, so I was relatively sure the pictures matched what she was
> selling
> rather than the auction title.
>
> Re fair prices, what the market will bear. :) 4-5 years ago I paid (as I
> recall) about $500-ish for one in near mint condition. Kept it a year and
> then sold it for about the same amount.
>
> As time goes on, the OM stuff is going to be harder & harder to
> find. I've
> really seen a HUGE drop in the offerings on eBay from just 5 years ago.
>
> Dave
>
> -----Original Message-----
>
> > All in all, a VERY near disaster. I'm just glad she accepted
> > responsibility
> > for her mistake and was willing to let me out of the deal.
> >
> Am I confused! Did she have a 2.0 or a 2.8? And what is a fair price for a
> 2.0 these days?
>
> Bill Pearce
>
>
> ==============================================
> List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
> List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
> ==============================================
>
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|