Hehe. I was the guy that won it, actually.
Paid almost $500 for one about 5 years ago, and quite frankly, it was worth
it. In my NSHO, it's the best lens Zuiko made (and yes, I had the 90/2 as
well). NOT intending to start a "No, THIS Zuiko was the best they made!"
battle.
I've had a VERY difficult time finding another, and hopped on it when I had
the chance.
Let's hope I feel the same about this one. I'll keep ya posted.
Dave
-----Original Message-----
From: olympus-owner@xxxxxxxxxx [mailto:olympus-owner@xxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf
Of keith_w
Sent: Wednesday, June 28, 2006 9:54 PM
To: olympus@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [OM] Re: heads-up on 190000651307
ScottGee1 wrote:
> The OM3 went for US$465 and the 100 for almost $400.
>
> ScottGee1
I hope that 100 f/2.0 wasn't won by one of you folks...
I was bidding too, and stopped when it reached near $400.
I couldn't believe it went that high, but soon it became obvious at least
two
guys knew it was a 2.0, not a 2.8...
Oh well. Blame me.
I went on and won a 24mm f/2.8 Zuiko. Nice lens.
keith whaley
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|