I think it may be bits of all three.
-----Original Message-----
From: olympus-owner@xxxxxxxxxx [mailto:olympus-owner@xxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Walt Wayman
Sent: Sunday, June 25, 2006 12:56 PM
To: olympus@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [OM] Re: heads-up on 190000651307
It's for sure a 100/2. In addition to asking if the pictures are really
of the actual lens being offered, I'd be curious about what's up with,
"Fits OM-3 camera- I could not get it to fit the OM-2 and am not sure
what other cameras it will fit." If he couldn't get it to fit an OM-2,
then either (A) the OM-2 is defective; (B) the lens is defective, or (C)
the seller is defective. I'd be real curious about which it is.
Walt
--
"Anything more than 500 yards from
the car just isn't photogenic." --
Edward Weston
-------------- Original message ----------------------
From: iwert <zuiko@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> a 100f2 in the pictures, described as a 100 f2.8
> might be worth to ask if the pictures are of the item for sale...
>
> Could become a bargain,
>
> iwert.
>
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
This message (including any attachments) contains confidential
and/or proprietary information intended only for the addressee.
Any unauthorized disclosure, copying, distribution or reliance on
the contents of this information is strictly prohibited and may
constitute a violation of law. If you are not the intended
recipient, please notify the sender immediately by responding to
this e-mail, and delete the message from your system. If you
have any questions about this e-mail please notify the sender
immediately.
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|