>
> Would I choose it over the ZD 35 Macro (if I had an E body)?
> They are different beasts with different strengths, but in
> light of the test shots posted last month showing what looks
> to be reflections of the rear element off the sensor, I
> probably would not choose it over the ZD. But I think you
> have to put that answer into the persepctive of what you
> bought, for the price you paid. To my mind you got a
> bargain, and even if the seller doesn't take the view that
> it's a bit late to be asking questions, I do!
>
Just to add another data point to those tests of the Tamron 90/2.5 on E-300,
I have just made some test shots with a Sigma 90/2.8 macro (thanks Parzival
!) and it doesn't show the "hot spot" that the Tamron shows.
...Wayne
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|