Hi Jeff,
I'm aware of that other site and Mike Hatam's test, but thanks. I don't
really need anything else besides the 35mm focal length. I already have
21/2, 24/2.8, 28/2, 50/2, and 100/2 Zuiko's. The standard 24/2.8 Zuiko is
a real winner on my SLR/c. The 35 shift has a lot of good spin lately, but
at around $500 it too much for a single focal length lens (and a little
big and heavy for f/2.8).
Best Regards,
Paul
> The Zuiko 35mm f2.8 shift lens probably behaves differently. It's rear
> element is receased almost 1/2 inch vs. protruding into the camera body
> like
> the 35/2.8 and 35/2.
>
> For what it's worth, a C*hon 1DsII user (Mike Hatam) tested many of the
> wide
> angle Zuikos. The 24/shift was a winner. The 35 shift was okay but he
> found
> something else he wanted to use.
>
> -jeff
>
> ----Original Message Follows----
> From: pdmphoto@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> I've been more than pleased with most OM Zuiko lenses for my OM-1 and
> Kodak SLR/c (Canon mount w/OM adapter). The one place I am having trouble
> is the 35mm focal length. I've tried a few different 35/2.8's and a 35/2.
> All are excellent optically, but they have a color shift across the frame
> - an issue with the SLR/c and some lenses. Strange, because all my other
> Zuiko lenses work without issue.
>
> Are there any other 35mm focal length lenses in OM mount that you could
> recommend?
>
> Thanks,
> Paul
>
>
>
> ==============================================
> List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
> List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
> ==============================================
>
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|