Ah, I see. It's very appealing, though I'm still wish they'd make a
6-8MP digicam with the 10x optical zoom and stabilization, like the 2200
UZI. I know they no longer have rights to IS as they did for the UZI,
but it would be nice.
Earl
Joel Wilcox wrote:
>The image returned by the C-8080 is basically 4:3. I think the sensor is
>3:2, but part of it is used for display stuff (histogram, etc.), so it
>makes 4:3 photos. That's how it was explained to me (thanks Winsor), I
>can't cite chapter and verse.
>
>In retrospect, the C-8080 has the feel of a miniature E-1. Build quality
>is the same. The lens is dynamite. That camera will continue to earn its
>keep.
>
>Joel W.
>
>At 07:15 PM 4/15/2005 -0400, you wrote:
>
>
>
>>Who did you get hooked on 4/3 by having an 8080? Was it simply the
>>overall quality or character of the camera, the lens, etc? It's not 4/3
>>right? Mind you, I think for a digicam the 8080 is pretty attractive.
>>
>>Earl
>>
>>
>
>
>
>==============================================
>List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
>List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
>==============================================
>
>
>
>
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|