[OM] Re: Olympus Trouble

[IanG]

Why should percentage suffer? It is entirely up to the photographer when to
press the button - the camera doesn't suddenly decide to fire a few hundred
bad frames.

High frame rates are available (I have 8.5fps) and that's one of the areas
where high levels of automation really show the benefits.

-----Original Message-----
From: olympus-owner@xxxxxxxxxx [mailto:olympus-owner@xxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf
Of Jeff Keller
Sent: 12 November 2004 02:05
To: olympus@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [OM] Re: Olympus Trouble


Glad you said count rather than percentage. You should also add winder/motor
drive into the equation so that it's broad enough to apply beyond OM's.

A month ago I switched from an OM4 to a OM3 to slow me down and get the
percentage up. Of course both my Mamiya & Horseman have next to no
performance. I use the OM as their light meter. But the 16x20 prints are so
nice...

-jeff

----- Original Message -----
From: "IanG" <I@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <olympus@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, November 11, 2004 5:15 PM
Subject: [OM] Re: Olympus Trouble


>
> Real world results. AF and IS achieve a higher keeper count.
>
>
>
> > Reality is that modern cameras are vastly superior in performance to the
> OM
> > system;
>
> That is an interesting assertion. What exactly is meant by "performance"?
>
> jh.
>

==============================================
List usage info:     http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies:        olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================



==============================================
List usage info:     http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies:        olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================