Very nice CH. Sometimes I think you could make nice images using the bottom
of a coke bottle for a lens though. Someday you should post some poor work
so we know you're human. /jmac
-----Original Message-----
From: olympus-owner@xxxxxxxxxx [mailto:olympus-owner@xxxxxxxxxx]On
Behalf Of C.H.Ling
Sent: Friday, July 23, 2004 9:03 AM
To: olympus@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [OM] Re: D1x digital; E-1 and macro
Yes, OM 135/4.5 and E-1 combination works pretty good, here most of them are
shot with 135/4.5 except one with 40/2:
http://www.accura.com.hk/OM/E-1_1/Lotus.html
C.H.Ling
----- Original Message -----
From: "W Shumaker" <om4t@xxxxxxxx>
> At 10:45 AM 7/23/2004, you wrote:
> ><snip> To get some working distance with the E-1,
> >the 25mm extension + 50-200 gives the following:
> >
> > focal | shooting range | magnification | 35mm equivalent
> > length
> >
> > 50 mm | 27.6 cm - 28.0 cm | 0.48 - 0.49 X | (0.96 - 0.98 X)
> > 135 mm | 48.9 cm - 53.9 cm | 0.25 - 0.32 X | (0.5 - 0.64 X)
> > 200 mm | 88.5 cm - 195.9 cm | 0.12 - 0.35 X | (0.24 - 0.7 X)
>
> I should have said, the 50-200 racked out to 200mm, + 25mm extension
> tube makes for a vibration prone setup. The 135mm + 65-115 extension
> + OM 4/3 adapter is more stable.
>
> Wayne
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|