Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] fisheyes

Subject: Re: [OM] fisheyes
From: andrew fildes <afildes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2003 14:32:03 +1100
andrew fildes wrote:
Both the 8mm and the 16mm had a UV filter in the early type replaced
by a 'neutral' filter in the later.

I'd never noticed this. Mine's an early one with a UV filter. When I checked this, I noticed a bit of weirdness with the front element. It looks like it's got bubbles around the edge. It almost looks like element separation, but according to the e-sif and parts diagram, the front element is just a single piece of glass. So, I removed the front element to investigate further. One thing that the e-sif doesn't show is that there's a brass ring glued to the back of the element. From the parts diagram, this might be CA165300 and/or CA160600. It's extremely hard to tell where the bubbles are on this very curved lens, but I'm thinking they might be from the brass ring pulling off. Has anyone seen this before? Does anyone know if it is possible to remove this ring, repaint the back of the element, and reglue the ring?

Mark


Paint loss or adhesive failure is the most likely reason. I have a couple of other brand lenses where there is glue failure causing white spot (Leica/Minolta 28mm for the CLE is a classic example where almost all have it) - looks fungally alarming but usually has no effect and is stable, although on a fish there may be a flare or reflection issue as a hood is impossible. It's cosmetically annoying too. Ideally, strip the brass ring, remove all paint, repaint and reglue the ring lightly if absolutely necessary. Awkward job given that you are handling a large and rare element.
AndrewF
(if you drop the element - I'll buy the rest of the lens :)

< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >




<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz